Updated Oct 16, 2026
/Rep. Andy Harris threatens student journalist with prosecution over recording/Verisk stock lags sector as AI adoption offsets rising costs/YouTube Music rolls out labels for generative AI content/Berkshire Hathaway's Alphabet Stake Aims to Extend Outperformance Under Greg Abel/Mamdani staff clash with endorsed candidate over ICE shooting rhetoric/S&P 500 Valuations Hit Dot-Com Era Highs as Shiller P/E Reaches 40.7/Rep. Andy Harris threatens student journalist with prosecution over recording/Verisk stock lags sector as AI adoption offsets rising costs/YouTube Music rolls out labels for generative AI content/Berkshire Hathaway's Alphabet Stake Aims to Extend Outperformance Under Greg Abel/Mamdani staff clash with endorsed candidate over ICE shooting rhetoric/S&P 500 Valuations Hit Dot-Com Era Highs as Shiller P/E Reaches 40.7

S&P 500 Valuations Hit Dot-Com Era Highs as Shiller P/E Reaches 40.7

The S&P 500 Shiller P/E ratio stood at 40.7 as of the beginning of October, marking the highest level since the dot-com bubble. This valuation metric, which averages inflation-adjusted earnings over the past decade for S&P 500 companies, has not been this high since the period from most of 1999 through mid-2000.

By Corinne Ashford2 min read
Share

The S&P 500 Shiller P/E ratio stood at 40.7 as of the beginning of October, marking the highest level since the dot-com bubble. This valuation metric, which averages inflation-adjusted earnings over the past decade for S&P 500 companies, has not been this high since the period from most of 1999 through mid-2000.

The current reading follows a sustained market rally that has pushed the index up more than 91% from its trough on October 12, 2022. During the dot-com era, when the Shiller P/E ratio remained above the current 40.7 level for much of 1999 and into mid-2000, the subsequent market correction resulted in the S&P 500 falling around 49% between March and October 2022. The article notes that while market crashes are inevitable and vary in length and severity, attempting to predict them is generally considered a losing strategy for long-term investors.

Historical data cited in the report illustrates the cost of market timing. From 1995 to the end of 2025, missing just 10 of the market's best-performing days reduced average annual returns from 10.3% to 7.4%. For a hypothetical $10,000 investment, this difference translates to a final value of $85,491 instead of $192,168. The analysis argues that staying invested allows investors to capture these high-performing days, which are often clustered around periods of market recovery.

While the article acknowledges that crashes can be particularly difficult for individuals nearing retirement who may need to liquidate shares, it emphasizes the importance of maintaining proper asset allocation and cash reserves. For long-term investors, the text suggests that a crash can serve as an opportunity to purchase shares at lower prices, whereas avoiding the market entirely may limit long-term upside due to unsustainable valuations. The report concludes that consistency in investing is more valuable than attempting to time market entries and exits.