Updated Jul 7, 2026
/Schall Law Firm reminds Insulet Corporation investors of PODD securities fraud class action/U.S. Strategic Bitcoin Reserve: What the Executive Order Actually Does/Jordan Henderson ruled out of 2026 World Cup after surgery on wrist fracture/Microsoft Cuts 4,800 Jobs as Xbox Downsizes and Plans to Spin Off Four Gaming Studios/Netanyahu Urges Trump to Block Turkey's F-35 Bid, Warning of Middle East Power Shift/Insulet Corporation Hit With Class Action Lawsuit; Investor-Rights Firm Urges PODD Shareholders to Act/Schall Law Firm reminds Insulet Corporation investors of PODD securities fraud class action/U.S. Strategic Bitcoin Reserve: What the Executive Order Actually Does/Jordan Henderson ruled out of 2026 World Cup after surgery on wrist fracture/Microsoft Cuts 4,800 Jobs as Xbox Downsizes and Plans to Spin Off Four Gaming Studios/Netanyahu Urges Trump to Block Turkey's F-35 Bid, Warning of Middle East Power Shift/Insulet Corporation Hit With Class Action Lawsuit; Investor-Rights Firm Urges PODD Shareholders to Act

Schall Law Firm reminds Insulet Corporation investors of PODD securities fraud class action

LOS ANGELES, July 7. The Schall Law Firm reminded investors Tuesday of a pending class action against Insulet Corporation (NASDAQ: PODD), citing alleged violations of Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act. The Los Angeles firm, which describes itself as a national shareholder rights litigation practice, said investors retain the opportunity to seek the lead plaintiff role in the case.

By Grace Osei2 min read
Share

LOS ANGELES, July 7. The Schall Law Firm reminded investors Tuesday of a pending class action against Insulet Corporation (NASDAQ: PODD), citing alleged violations of Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act. The Los Angeles firm, which describes itself as a national shareholder rights litigation practice, said investors retain the opportunity to seek the lead plaintiff role in the case.

The securities fraud allegations

The complaint against Insulet names two provisions of the Securities Exchange Act. Section 10(b) is the principal federal anti-fraud statute governing securities purchases and sales; Section 20(a) holds controlling persons liable when someone under their direction has violated the Act. The Schall Law Firm's announcement did not identify the specific misstatements or omissions alleged, the class period, or the amount of investor losses at issue in the Insulet action.

Lead plaintiff window

Courts overseeing securities class actions appoint a lead plaintiff to direct litigation strategy on behalf of all class members. The firm's Tuesday reminder told PODD holders they still have standing to seek that designation. No motion deadline was disclosed in the announcement.

The source summary provided for this article was truncated and did not include the class period, named defendants beyond Insulet Corporation itself, or any claimed damages figure. The Schall Law Firm is a national shareholder rights litigation firm based in Los Angeles. Insulet Corporation, identified in the complaint as "Insulet" or "the Company," trades on the Nasdaq under the ticker symbol PODD.

Key takeaways

Frequently asked

What company is the class action against?

The class action is against Insulet Corporation, which trades on the Nasdaq under the ticker symbol PODD.

What laws does the complaint say Insulet violated?

The complaint cites alleged violations of Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act, the principal federal anti-fraud statute and the controlling-person liability provision, respectively.

Can investors still become the lead plaintiff?

Yes, the firm's Tuesday reminder said PODD holders still have standing to seek the lead plaintiff designation, though no motion deadline was disclosed.

Did the announcement reveal the class period or investor losses?

No, the Schall Law Firm's announcement did not identify the class period, the specific misstatements alleged, or the amount of investor losses at issue.