Updated 2026-06-20T04:21:18.413756+03:00
/DOJ Refuses to Assure Judge It Will Not Proceed With 'Anti-Weaponization' Fund/First Horizon Corporation Sets July 15 Date for Second Quarter Earnings Release/Mississippi Residents File Federal Class Action Against xAI and SpaceX Over Southaven Turbine Noise/SpaceX IPO Expected to Face Its Real Test After Debut, Devere Warns/DeFi Exploits Total $36.7M Over Six Months as Humanity Protocol Loses $36M; CLARITY Act Stalls/KuCoin Revamps KCS Token Utility on Ninth Anniversary, Targeting Unified User Experience/DOJ Refuses to Assure Judge It Will Not Proceed With 'Anti-Weaponization' Fund/First Horizon Corporation Sets July 15 Date for Second Quarter Earnings Release/Mississippi Residents File Federal Class Action Against xAI and SpaceX Over Southaven Turbine Noise/SpaceX IPO Expected to Face Its Real Test After Debut, Devere Warns/DeFi Exploits Total $36.7M Over Six Months as Humanity Protocol Loses $36M; CLARITY Act Stalls/KuCoin Revamps KCS Token Utility on Ninth Anniversary, Targeting Unified User Experience

DOJ Refuses to Assure Judge It Will Not Proceed With 'Anti-Weaponization' Fund

The Justice Department has rebuffed a federal judge's request to commit in writing that it will not move forward with an "anti-weaponization" fund, a vehicle the DOJ announced in May as part of a settlement of President Donald Trump's $10 billion lawsuit against the Internal Revenue Service.

By Tomas Reyes2 min read
Share

The Justice Department has rebuffed a federal judge's request to commit in writing that it will not move forward with an "anti-weaponization" fund, a vehicle the DOJ announced in May as part of a settlement of President Donald Trump's $10 billion lawsuit against the Internal Revenue Service.

A Settlement Fund Under Judicial Scrutiny

The DOJ's refusal to provide written assurances puts the department on a collision course with the judiciary over one of the more consequential financial instruments to emerge from the Trump administration's legal campaigns. The fund was first disclosed in May, when the Justice Department announced it as part of the resolution of Trump's $10 billion suit against the IRS.

The judge's request for written confirmation that the department would stand down signals the court has active concerns about whether the fund will actually be shelved — or whether the administration intends to keep it operational. By declining to put anything in writing, the DOJ leaves the fund's legal status formally unresolved.

What the Fund Represents

The "anti-weaponization" label reflects the Trump administration's argument that federal agencies, including the IRS, have been deployed as political instruments against the president and his allies. The $10 billion lawsuit against the tax agency was among the most prominent legal actions built on that claim.

Attaching a settlement fund to that litigation adds a financial dimension to what has largely played out as a political and legal dispute. The court's evident discomfort with the arrangement — enough to prompt a direct request for written guarantees — indicates the settlement terms may face continued examination.

What Comes Next

The DOJ's refusal to provide written confirmation leaves the fund's future unresolved. A judge requesting explicit written assurances, and receiving a rebuff, may set the stage for further legal proceedings. The department offered no public explanation for declining to put its intentions in writing.